CNNs 'Black' Mis-fires

Kudos to CNN's Soledad O'Brien for parlaying clout earned from her award winning coverage of Hurricane Katrina into a much anticipated report on African Americans... I guess?

America's fascination with its African population is longstanding. New York Senator Daniel P. Moynihan made a name for himself reporting on the status of black people (1965). There was the Kerner Commission report in 1968 which, among other things reported on the disaffection black people felt with American justice. I remember that, in the late 1980s Newsweek magazine made the plight of black males a focus of a bestselling "special report." Indeed every notable talk show host from Phil Donahue to Ted Koppel has examined the "state of Black America." On the surface, such reporting comes across as genuine interest in the challenging issues facing America's foremost minority population -- Hispanics not withstanding. However, I wonder, cynically I admit, if it is not merely a curious preoccupation with how Americans of African decent are able to consistently persevere in the face of systematic racism.

O'Brien's reporting had a great flaw. At the crux of all the difficult issues facing black people was our achievement, or underachievement, as it relates to the majority racial group in the United States -- white people. [A population itself that is more varied in its ethnicity and class distinctions than blacks]. It is difficult to take issue with the Soledad O'Brien’s motives. She is as full of integrity as she is charming. Each profile started positive enough, referring to African-Americans traditions: reunions, family dinners, pursing education, and holding down fine jobs. Predictably, however, those perspectives served as a segway into what many perceive as unyielding pathologies in black America. All the traditional shortcomings were analyzed: Incarceration of black males, the vaunted "achievement gap," absentee fathers, and the newest alarm -- disproportionate (new) AIDS cases among black women. CNN's coverage had all the trappings of an in-depth exposé, but with the shallow incision of a tabloid magazine.

Black In America was billed as a thorough report on the diverse issues facing black people today, yet it perpetuated stereotypes – mostly addressing issues that liberals and bigots want to examine. O'Brien discussed the plight of black families without any historical footage, or real discussion, about the concerted efforts to hinder families from surviving since slavery. She examined black men in prison without tracing the systematic use of the penal system to maintain disproportionate rates of black male incarceration since the days of the chain gangs --when (southern) authorities used false imprisonment to create a ready labor force for public works contractors. Limited facts about the proliferation of AIDS in urban America gave the false impression that African American women are walking Petri dishes for the disease. And most troubling for me was the notion that the achievement of black children in school requires extraordinary enticements; a position that will only serve to perpetuate bigoted ideas about innate inferiority. Or that their failure is alarming only because they fall short of the achievements of (some) white children in school.

What Black In America left out was far more important that what it covered. Cheap cocaine influenced the drug economy greatly in the 1980s, but the disproportionate sentencing of black people for the same crimes committed by whites – trafficking – predisposed them to incarceration. A discussion of reparations for slavery found not light in this exposé. COINTELPRO, racial profiling, or the corporatizations of Hip Hop were lost discussions too. And should not a discussion of the underachievement of (some) African American children in school have included the disproportionate assignment of black youth, especially boys, into special education classes -- mostly for perceived behavior issues? There is reliable research on the topic.

Certainly African Americans have come far in our history as a people. The most important feature of African American sociology, however, is that despite economic stratification and diverse political orientations on everything from school vouchers to same-sex marriage, we still identify as a single people. But then again, we've never really had a choice in that...did we?

Schooling Black Children, Part I

Addressing this topic is like running a gauntlet. The title alone is enough to peak interest, or cause one to dismiss it immediately. People seem only to want to discuss issues generically anymore. Despite the most earnest intentions, if you tinge the discussion with race, you immediately polarize readers. And not just along racial lines. Blacks as well as whites would rather not discuss these matters in mixed company -- no matter how strong their points of view. And other ethnic groups expect that the discussion simply does not pertain to them at all. So why bother?

I am going to muse openly about educating black children -- not only because it is a topic dear to me, but it is an area where I can claim some expertise. I am a public school teacher and administrator, and father of two school-aged children. And, yes, I am African-American. This little fact is not only important for full disclosure, but I have had occasion to find myself in a pivotal role as the single black figure in a predominately suburban (white) school, where minority children look to me with optimism. Or, like presently, I routinely lay down the discipline in a predominately black middle school.

Next, I want to make some statements of truth that I have come to learn in my experience. Black and white children have equal learning ability across the board. Despite the much vaunted "learning gap" their is no innate advantage I can discern. [Variables such as quality teachers, competent administrators, and supportive environments outside of school cannot be discounted in the equasion.] White teachers do not routinely and openly discriminate against black children in the way of the Little Rock Nine, or in the manner described by figures like Malcolm X in his autobiography (i.e, "You should do something more reasonable for a person of your race...") -- at least it is not commonplace anymore. Public schools still posses huge possibilities for economically disadvantaged students and their families to gain a leg up -- even in poor inner city communities. Finally, there is an educational deficit facing urban (black) youth that cannot be denied.

Rather than report the numerous deficits experienced by black children in various quality of life indicators, I'll refer you to the published work by the Smiley Group (The Covenant), or the National Urban League's annual report. Or you can refer to the May 16 issue of The Economist magazine (Black America). My objections is not with the facts, or with the perspectives commonly espoused; it is with the assumptions, platitudes and covert discrimination that predominate education for black children, especially those from families who are poor and unable to navigate their way through the system.

One peeve of have is with the inevitable comparisons of black students to whites. Whatever indicator you choose to measure achievement among students -- state assessments, SAT scores, drop-out rates, etc. -- there is an objective level of attainment that spells success, despite how well white children do comparably. All of the research mentioned routinely uses racial comparisons to dramatize the failure of black children. If black students under perform against white students, then, is it true that once the "achievement gap" is somehow closed, we can again sing Cum-by-ya?" Or will black students next have to surpass Asian students who are increasingly outperforming white students now-- in math and science? In fact, if there is to be any comparison at all, should not black students be measured against those in first place...not in second? You see...That story is not sexy enough for the race-based superiority complex in America.

Children of all races need to be made ready to compete in the best college enviroments they can afford and, ultimately, at the highest rungs of the national economy they can ascend. There is an objective standard of achievement they need to meet --irrespective of how another ethnic group is performing. That is the best way to know you are getting an education.

African Triumph

We must always explain that Black history is not only the story of a sad era in human history, but in fact a story of perseverance... Triumph, in fact.

A Giant of a Man

Paul Robeson was a towering figure. Before we knew of the valiant contributions of Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcom X or even Muhammad Ali, Robeson was the standard barer for black male dignity and success. In a time when blacks were discouraged from education, caricatured in the media, and marginalized politically, there stood Robeson. An college educated lawyer, football player, accomplished concert performer, a cinematic and stage actor, Paul Robeson was the very definition of a "renaissance man." However, it was Robeson's activism that made him a notable figure among 20th Century personalities. Paul Robeson refused to be marginalize by Jim Crow America. He became a strident citizen of the world at a time when black people were supposed to accept their place as secondary -- or even invisible -- members of American society.

I want my children, and the students I teach, to know about Paul Robeson. Unfortunaley they live in a time when the most dubious personalities and destructive images predominate the media. Snoop Dogg, Britney Spears, Flava Flav, and countless other pop personalities and junk food activities are used to distract young people from meaning information. Information that could inspire them to successfully leap the vaunted learning gap and avoid mental slavery.

Bill Cosby: The Most Relavant Personality Today?

Bill Cosby does not have to speak out on the issues facing the largely urban (black) underclass. He is wealthy and influential. Mr. Cosby has built up enough goodwill in the entertainment business to be lauded for years -- even if he doesn't make another sitcom, or host another children's program. Self-appointed "leaders" in the black community deride his activism. However, he, unlike many of his detractors, cannot be ignored so easily. His critics call him cynical, elitist and out of touch. I believe that he is disapointed in the lack of pride exhibited by some of our people. An absence of pride that too often manifests in degenerate behavior with generational implications. And "there can be no great disapointment where the no great love." Soldier on, Mr. Cosby -- and thanks.

Book Review: Islam & the Blackamerican

I am recommending a book I read recently. If, like me, you are interested in sociology and religious issues, then Sherman A. Jackson wrote what I think is one of the more interesting books on Islam of late. In Islam and the Blackamerican: Looking toward the Third Resurrection, Jackson thoroughly addresses the influence Islam has made on African-American people.

Despite the prominent role of Muslims like Malcolm X, Muhammad Ali and many others held in the popular conscience of America during the 1960's and 70's, the face of Islam today is no longer immediately synonymous with Black people. Vast immigration to the United States, especially by Arab and Pakistani nationals, have changed the image of Islam in America. It is this dynamic, and its consequences for the prototypical African-American Muslim, that Jackson writes about in his book.

Sherman Jackson describes the effective 'appropriation' of Islamic culture into a viable protest culture, and ultimately a contending religious movement by Black Americans. Forerunners of the prevailing Sunni Islamic movement, which most African-American Muslims identify with today, were Noble Drew Ali and the Honorable Elijah Muhammad. Sherman explains how these men were able to forge a new state of consciousness and activism among working class and poor urban Blacks in early 20Th century America. They accomplished this feat using only strains of what Islamic culture that were to survive slavery. Do largely to the vision and organizational brilliance of Elijah Muhammad, immaculately dressed, industrious, educated, disciplined black men became the most recognizable face of Islam in America by the 1970's.

This all changed with the coming of immigrant Muslims. With their [other-worldliness], facility with the Arabic language, social customs -- be they rooted in Islam or not -- and their penchant for non-assimilation, immigrant Muslims became the de-facto authenticators of Blackamerican Islam. This dynamic was made even more possible due to the demise of Elijah Muhammad and the radical changes undertaken by the Nation of Islam's new leadership, W. Deen Muhammad. Sherman reveals how one of the most influential religious movements of the twentieth century found itself fractured and adrift without a paddle in a sea of change.

There is more to Jackson's book than space will allow me to convey. In order to avoid a complete summary of the book, suffice it to say that the author refers, hopefully, to a new resurrection of Blackamerican Muslims. A resurrection that does not compromise either their authenticity as Muslims, or negate their own cultural heritage. This movement is possible without casting off the highest ideas of American style democracy and prosperity, contends Jackson. To this end the Author suggests that African-American Muslims give serious consideration to the wisdom and moral direction espoused through Sufism - an Islamic tradition with well established roots in the Muslim world. Jackson posits that Sufism serves dual possibilities for Black people. First, it reconnects naturally to cultural traditions in West Africa. Second, it can arrests recidivism is the Black Muslim community through its emphasis on piety. And it has a cannon of religious precepts that will stand against scrutiny.

Read Islam and the Blackamerican.